Published: October 27, 2026 - 3:01 PM
Nearly 100 Karachi Housing Societies Face Land Disputes Worth an Estimated Rs 1 Trillion
کراچی کی تقریباً 100 ہاؤسنگ سوسائٹیوں میں ایک کھرب روپے کی اراضی متنازعہ ہونے کا انکشاف
▫️
Karachi | ReNews PakistanLand disputes involving nearly 100 cooperative housing societies in Karachi concern properties reportedly valued at approximately Rs 1 trillion, according to a newspaper report citing the Sindh Cooperatives Depar...
Karachi | ReNews Pakistan
Land disputes involving nearly 100 cooperative housing societies in Karachi concern properties reportedly valued at approximately Rs 1 trillion, according to a newspaper report citing the Sindh Cooperatives Department. The report alleges that administrative irregularities and violations of restrictions on property transactions have exposed several societies to litigation, investigations and uncertainty for members. The societies reportedly include nine operating under government administration. Alleged violations involve plot allotments, transfers, ownership changes, development work and other transactions undertaken despite restrictions imposed in 2017. The report says these actions have contributed to disputes over valuable land and raised questions about oversight of administrators appointed to manage society affairs. According to the report, the provincial cooperatives secretary took notice of the alleged breaches and issued a letter reiterating the restrictions. The communication reportedly warned government administrators and relevant officials against exceeding their authority or undertaking activities prohibited under the existing framework. The report refers to the Sindh Cooperative Housing Authority Ordinance, 1982, and departmental instructions governing administrators’ responsibilities. It states that administrators appointed to societies should focus on authorised administrative functions, including verification of members, scrutiny of records and arrangements for elections, rather than exercising unrestricted powers over land and financial matters. The department’s instructions, as reproduced in the report, prohibit administrators from allotting or transferring plots, changing ownership, approving subdivisions or amalgamations, and allowing commercial use of society property. Restrictions also reportedly cover development expenditure, new appointments and the appointment of legal advisers without the required authorisation. Financial controls form another part of the instructions. Societies are reportedly required to operate bank accounts through joint signatures, while payments exceeding Rs 500 must be made through crossed cheques. Expenditure above Rs 25,000, except employees’ salaries, requires prior approval from the competent authority, according to the report. Administrators must also submit monthly statements detailing their societies’ income and expenditure. The clipping presents these requirements as safeguards intended to improve transparency, protect members’ interests and prevent unauthorised financial decisions. However, it alleges that violations continued after the restrictions were introduced in 2017. Among the societies named in the report are government employees’ housing schemes and other cooperative residential societies across Karachi. Some have reportedly held elections and handed management to elected representatives, while others remain under government administration. The report alleges that no substantial action had been taken against administrators over the violations it describes. The provincial cooperatives secretary reportedly said he had recently assumed charge and would respond after examining the matter. The clipping does not provide detailed responses from the individual administrators or societies named, nor does it establish the outcome of the reported cases and investigations. For society members and prospective purchasers, the central concern is whether disputed transactions were properly authorised and supported by verified records. The reported Rs 1 trillion figure represents an estimate of the value of land involved in disputes; it should not be interpreted as an established financial loss. The allegations and valuation remain attributed to the newspaper report, pending examination of the underlying departmental correspondence, society records and any relevant judicial findings.